day zero

I refuse to believe that one can simply write a heteronym into existence.

"the poet is a faker."

the bottom line is that it still comes from the same person who materialises the words.
In the end, the pen that writes a person into existence, dies together with the first person, I.
When the maker ceases to exist, is the made still produced?

Or, perhaps these heteronyms are borrowed. Borrowed from real people who themselves once lived and existed, either on paper or in cities or villages.

"the one is real"
you lose one, you lose all. the simple fact that drives all of these pens together.

whether by method or by order, there is a ferocious force that kills the authors. And we are left to submit to that will, even if someone may continue the pen and write as if the heteronym lives.

- Pessoa

But he is dead -
That is what he cannot say with a honesty.
That has to be written by someone else.
the next performance begins where the previous left off.

- Alvim

There is a method that is persuasive, precisely because it is linear.
It can only happen because after one dies, while the other is /born.